Now, talking about sub clocks means pointing directly to a category of timepieces that is normally used for even ten per cent of its possible.
What good is it to possess the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", if the individual has secured his wrist to the maximum following a dip along with a couple of strokes, return instantly to couch under the umbrella?
If this is their principal use, it is only the fault of old habits at least as much as the debut of the so-called divers of this modern era that dates back into the center of the last century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three decades later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces the group can boast, was already tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of their well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -movie also winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that even non-fans will remember well one of the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the film Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied to his wrist due to his fabric strap became a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to know each other without the crown protector shoulders, imitated a bit by everybody.
These are just a couple of the very first cases that show - fiction or reality - for more than fifty years the media - driven by the watch sector - decided that the diver watches ought to be the very first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Maybe it's also from that day that the manufacturers when it came to describing their models started to use the phrase: "suitable for any event".
The 007 change, unfortunately also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all the mechanics of the most well-known secret agent on earth, and clearly also the watch whose function was played by the Omega Seamaster for several decades.
But beyond their actual use within this massive family whose check here origins would simply deal with "hard even greater than steel", today there are also versions so click here bejeweled to dread even when you have to wash the palms.
However, a true diver's view has normally always had a lot to say technically talking. Let us just mention the characteristics and constructive characteristics of those fascinating references.
I've a long standing friend who is an expert diver and who, during his diving at the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - including that valve to get the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at large depths.
A True wrist sub must be able to ensure the following performances:
Excellent visibility throughout the dip
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to impact and salt water
Accurate confirmation of the operation of the device that reports that the dive time
An in-depth test of the efficacy of its motion, either mechanical or quartz
However, the tests did not end here: today professional diving watches need to adhere to specific rules like the ones described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal usage, what we know is the best, the best sub could be ultimately a watchable to provide features considerably milder and easier to manage.
I recall this in order to only immerse the surface at maximum safety, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (about 50 meters), which appears to be redundant, but that isn't so when it is done a banal swim at the sea. It would be better to prevent diving, especially if ours couldn't even rely on a screw-on crown better still when protected on the sides from the classic two shoulders.
And the security on the waterproof status of the submerged timepieces?
Precisely for people who would use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to have the ability to rely on a system that visually signals on the dial in the event the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is consequently in a clear state of non-security.
Sadly, this is the primary reason why an abyssal super dive watch may have to be hurried into a service centre, before seawater entering risks compromising any mechanism indefinitely. This function already exists, however on very few versions, which frankly I do not understand why.
You might have worn your diving diver's watch in your wrist in order to visit the sea and as a result, after correcting the time, have left to twist the crown tightly. It is by far the most frequent case.
Suggestion - As soon as you've worn the costume decide on the fly leave your diver somewhere safe or obligatorily make a closing but fundamental check on the trimming of the winding crown.
Now that we have seen a bit 'of issues related to the time that has to meet with the water, and given the essential advice, click here I reveal you which - so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They are not many: I've divided them into two classes. The order in which they appear doesn't represent any position.